Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

نویسندگان

  • Peter K Lindenauer
  • Denise Remus
  • Sheila Roman
  • Michael B Rothberg
  • Evan M Benjamin
  • Allen Ma
  • Dale W Bratzler
چکیده

BACKGROUND Public reporting and pay for performance are intended to accelerate improvements in hospital care, yet little is known about the benefits of these methods of providing incentives for improving care. METHODS We measured changes in adherence to 10 individual and 4 composite measures of quality over a period of 2 years at 613 hospitals that voluntarily reported information about the quality of care through a national public-reporting initiative, including 207 facilities that simultaneously participated in a pay-for-performance demonstration project funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; we then compared the pay-for-performance hospitals with the 406 hospitals with public reporting only (control hospitals). We used multivariable modeling to estimate the improvement attributable to financial incentives after adjusting for baseline performance and other hospital characteristics. RESULTS As compared with the control group, pay-for-performance hospitals showed greater improvement in all composite measures of quality, including measures of care for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia and a composite of 10 measures. Baseline performance was inversely associated with improvement; in pay-for-performance hospitals, the improvement in the composite of all 10 measures was 16.1% for hospitals in the lowest quintile of baseline performance and 1.9% for those in the highest quintile (P<0.001). After adjustments were made for differences in baseline performance and other hospital characteristics, pay for performance was associated with improvements ranging from 2.6 to 4.1% over the 2-year period. CONCLUSIONS Hospitals engaged in both public reporting and pay for performance achieved modestly greater improvements in quality than did hospitals engaged only in public reporting. Additional research is required to determine whether different incentives would stimulate more improvement and whether the benefits of these programs outweigh their costs.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Do Cardiology Quality Measures Actually Improve Patient Outcomes?

C ardiovascular quality measures for inpatient care have undergone a rapid evolution over the past three decades. Isolated efforts at simply measuring quality have developed into national programs dedicated toward the public reporting of hospital performance on a number of quality measures. Most recently, performance on quality measures has become closely tied to hospital and physician payments...

متن کامل

Framing Bias in the Interpretation of Quality Improvement Data: Evidence From an Experiment

Background A growing body of public management literature sheds light on potential shortcomings to quality improvement (QI) and performance management efforts. These challenges stem from heuristics individuals use when interpreting data. Evidence from studies of citizens suggests that individuals’ evaluation of data is influenced by the linguistic framing or context of that information an...

متن کامل

Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?

This study evaluates the impact on quality improvement of reporting hospital performance publicly versus privately back to the hospital. Making performance information public appears to stimulate quality improvement activities in areas where performance is reported to be low. The findings from this Wisconsin-based study indicate that there is added value to making this information public.

متن کامل

Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

BACKGROUND Previous reviews have shown inconsistent effects of publicly reported performance data on quality of care, but many new studies have become available in the 7 years since the last systematic review. PURPOSE To synthesize the evidence for using publicly reported performance data to improve quality. DATA SOURCES Web of Science, MEDLINE, EconLit, and Wilson Business Periodicals (199...

متن کامل

The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff.

OBJECTIVE To assess perceptions about the value and impact of publicly reporting hospital performance measure data. DESIGN Qualitative research. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Administrators, physicians, nurses and other front-line staff from 29 randomly selected Joint Commission-accredited hospitals reporting core performance measure data. METHODS Structured focus-group interviews were conduct...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The New England journal of medicine

دوره 356 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007